Thursday, April 15, 2010

School Budget Blues or Sustainability Challenge? You decide.


Christina Selby

The State Legislature has forced the SFPS to accommodate an approximate $6.9 million budget reduction for this upcoming budget cycle.

We at the Sustainable Education Task Force believe that student-led, district-wide sustainability initiatives have the potential to save the district more than double what they will gain from closing a school (one of the cost saving ideas on the table).

The District has taken some measures to realize energy savings and to green their buildings - I applaud them. Have they exhausted all possibilities? Definitely not.

Computers remain turned on at most schools 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Without power strips to turn off phantom power schools continue to suck energy when we are not looking - often estimated of up to 20-30% of utility bills. Schools are still paying SFWMA to pick up the organic matter in their trash rather than composting it on site - an estimate 1/3 of all school trash, and the trash bill, is organic matter. 10,000s of square feet of school buildings with 10,000s of square feet of water catchment potential sit on dozens of acres of unused, eroding landscapes. Santa Fe is rife with frustrated backyard gardeners and budding young farmers just itching for a few acres to grow food on. On-site organic farming could provide fresh, healthy produce to school lunch programs at a fraction of the cost of transporting pre-cooked, packaged foods from across the country. Most school hallways are lit to 30 foot candles, when they only require 10 - take out some of those light bulbs and realize more energy savings. Better yet, turn off the lights and use daylight where it is available.

These are all practical things that can be done immediately by students. And if they are done in every school in the district, the savings could be enormous. Imagine taking one week to engage students at every school in the district in energy, waste, water, transportation and food audits to get the data they need to implement these solutions. They'll learn science, math, social studies, even language arts at the same time so no worries about getting behind in the curriculum. In fact real-world teaching practices like these have been shown to increase student engagement which in turn leads to improved academic achievement. These are win-win ideas for everyone.

The district could also choose to use a professional energy audit company, like the City of SF just did and realized much cost savings to their budget. But, such top-down initiatives will only go so far without a comprehensive district-wide educational campaign directed at changing behaviors of the facility users - students, teachers, staff, and parents. I prefer top-championed initiatives led by youth for youth. Like the student-initiated and -led recycling competition going on for Earth Week in seven Santa Fe high Schools.

I don't believe SFPS should consider closing any schools and suffer the inevitable unintended social consequences and delay effects for years to come (increased drop out rates, loss of community, increase in crime - just a few of the social consequences mentioned at tonight's meeting) - until they exhaust ALL possible sustainability cost saving ideas.

Think about it - would you rather have kindergartners sweat a little bit in May because we left the air conditioners off and opened the windows to save on utility bills or have 22 of them struggling in a classroom with one teacher all year? I think this kind of slight physical discomfort is bearable given the massive social consequences we might face if other proposals go through.

I believe that if sustainable Santa Feans put their heads together and generate a list of all the cost saving sustainability measures out there, we'll surely be able to save multiple schools from closing, or at the very least plug some big holes in next year's budget. So put on your creative thinking caps and send us your mini-miracles! Your singular ideas may not seem like much to you, but put it in a spreadsheet with everyone else's and they add up fast!

The Sustainability Education Task Force will be posting successful sustainability ideas and examples from around the country on this blog and invite you to do the same. We are especially interested in student-centered initiatives. If we collect enough feasible ideas in time, we will present them to the Board of Education (giving you credit for your ideas of course) meeting on Earth Day, April 22nd.

Help us turn this budget crisis into an opportunity to forward sustainability in Santa Fe schools!

Post your ideas in the comment box with links to any online information or email them to us and we'll get them up.

LET’S TAKE THIS ON CREATIVE SUSTAINABLE SANTA FEANS!


A Report from the Thursday, April 15th, 2010 BOE Budget Meeting

Christina Selby & Lucy Foma

Over 140 people attended the Santa Fe Board of Education meeting on Thursday night to find out what the future holds for our schools. The State Legislature has forced the SFPS to accommodate an approximate $7.4 million budget reduction. This is no small sum, so the School Board has been looking to a Budget Advisory Committee and the public for ideas on ways to close this gap. Since our public schools already cut $5.4 million during the 2009-2010 year, and next year will likely bring more cuts, the solution to this problem will inevitably come from multiple actions and no singular change.

Superintendent Gutierrez started off the meeting with one piece of good news - NMPED gave its official nod to the District to allow for less State mandated student testing (yea!). I think lots of kids will breathe easier from that decision. Board and community members followed with heartfelt presentations expressing their feelings and opinions on the various proposed budget cuts.

The strain and sadness for what faces our schools and our most precious community resource - our children - was palpable in the room. In unfortunate displays of interpersonal conflict, Board members chided each other for passing off knee jerk reactions as solutions, lack of transparency, and political posturing, among other things and continued to lobby that at each other throughout the meeting. Times of stress make leaders do ugly things I guess. Let's hope they do it off the mic next time.

Some budget cutting options being considered include: 2% salary reductions for administrators, 1% for teachers and 0.5% for all other employees. Other budget reduction suggestions include: reduce substitute costs by having administrators substitute teach one day per week every two weeks, eliminate special education support specialists' positions, increase the length of the school day in order to go to a four day week to save in transportation costs, use emergency cash reserves to prevent cuts to Art and Music, early retirement for teachers if possible instead of layoffs or pay cuts, or use capitol funds (for buildings, etc.) to pay for teachers, programs, and textbooks. Art and music classes are also on the chopping block.

The most controversial proposals come from the "Facilities Realignment" plan involving closing or consolidating the District's small schools. The two largest expenses for the SFPS are Direct Instruction ($58,925,000) and Operation/Maintenance of Plant ($10,821,000). By consolidating Alvord, Larragoite and Kaune Elementary schools into the renovated building that was formerly Alameda Middle School, the School Board thinks it can save $771,542 (without including the cost of renovating Alameda). The Board is assuming that a large part of the budget could be made up from renting out the facilities that are currently used as Larragoite, Kaune and Alvord ($498,952 next year with higher expected revenue in year 2). Given, however, that SFPS can expect further cuts for 2011-2012 due to the state's economic strain, the last 48 hours have seen more proposals for schools closings. Acequia Madre seems to have risen to the top of that list with estimates of cost savings thrown out at the meeting ranging from $125,000 - $250,000. (FYI – Rio Rancho School District saved $160,000 last year from some cursory energy conservation measures by a handful of teachers and students – things list using power strips so you can turn off computers at the end of the day).

Board President, Richard Polese, wrapped up the meeting announcing they will make and present their "near final" decisions next Thursday, April 22nd (Earth Day) at a the public meeting. The meeting ended with BOE members voting with their dots on budget cuts posted around the room. Same location next week: BOE Board Room at 610 Alto Vista Street. It promises to be an even more interesting meeting than this week’s standing-room only one.

All Board members are recieving comments via phone and email. Angelica Ruiz is holding office hours at Mikolos Cafe on Jaguar Road every other Saturday. The next one is Saturday, April 17tb. Take them up on the opportunity to have your voices heard!

7 comments:

  1. Students save on trash pick-up bill recycling organic matter AND make money for their school selling compost:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWHLcJHVPvE

    ReplyDelete
  2. Technical Assistance from New Mexico Environment Department

    The P2 program offers a number of FREE services to help businesses, municipalites, tribes & pueblos, and other organizations meet their efficiency and environmental goals.

    P2 staff will visit your establishment and conduct an assesment of your waste streams, water & energy use, and transporation use.

    http://www.nmenv.state.nm.us./p2/

    ReplyDelete
  3. I heard an idea that I really liked from a teacher, suggesting that if the public school transportation combined with city transportation, schools could save money and the city wouldn't be subsidizing empty buses.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Think New Mexico

    *Saving Santa Fe's Small Schools*

    Dear Friend of Think New Mexico,

    As you've probably seen in the news, the Santa Fe School Board is considering closing several of the city's small schools to close its
    $6.9 million budget gap. Closing and consolidating smaller schools contradicts over three decades of research finding that students perform better in smaller schools.

    Think New Mexico has proposed an alternative plan: rather than closing small schools, Santa Fe Public Schools should reduce the size of all of the district's schools to no more than 400 students (the maximum size recommended by the research), thereby ensuring that every child in Santa Fe has access to a small elementary school.

    We surveyed the current enrollments and capacities of each of the K-6 schools in Santa Fe and found that if we shifted 1,155 students out of the seven largest K-6 schools, we could reduce their populations to no more than 400. Fortunately, there is plenty of space available elsewhere in the district if we use the existing school facilities creatively.

    Along with this restructuring plan, Think New Mexico has proposed a series of targeted cuts to administrative costs which would cover the budget deficit while protecting the learning in the classroom. Read our entire plan, as it appeared this morning in the /Albuquerque Journal North/,
    along with their supportive editorial.


    The school board meets tomorrow to decide which path Santa Fe's schools will take.

    *Please click here to email the school board and Superintendent
    Gutierrez* *and ask them to support small schools for all students*
    and balance the budget by cutting administration, not the classroom.

    Thank you for your help!

    Fred, Kristina, Jason, and Lynne
    Think New Mexico

    ReplyDelete
  5. Mark Ericson, Santa Fe Indian School teacher

    SFPS has plans to conduct an audit of school energy use as a way of identifying ways of cutting energy expenditures. This, along with other plans to identify energy and utility cost saving measures, are in the future, have yet to be implemented, and do not involve the students themselves.

    Yet energy use, water use and the waste stream are rich content areas that are taylor-made for active, inquiry-based, interdisciplinary curriculum development that has multiple benefits, and meets many state and national educational standards, goals, and objectives with development of perspectives that progress naturally from local (household, school, neighborhood, school district, municipality) to state, national and global.

    Such a community-based curriculum can begin to be introduced in the short term, almost immediately, to realize utility bill savings for the school district, and can be done in a way that involves students directly in creative and good-natured competition between classes, grades, and even schools.

    This kind of curriculum can be developed progressively through the grades, and could include, for example, age and grade-level appropriate explorations which incorporate math, science, vocabulary development and reading, writing, economics, research, sociology and communications.

    Examples of community-based and contextual curriculum units that can be developed in the context of students identifying and reducing consumption and expenditures include:

    Energy (electricity, natural gas) - uses, sources, physical science, measures (math), transformations, consumption rates, waste, pollution, technologies and alternatives, efficiency, social and environmental implications, challenges
    Water - uses, sources, watersheds, natural and physical sciences (chemistry, biology, physiology, ecology), measures (math), consumption rates, waste, pollution, technologies, efficiency, social and environmental implications, challenges
    Materials Consumption and Waste Stream - types and uses, sources, natural and physical sciences (chemistry, biology, physiology, ecology), measures (math), consumption rates, waste, pollution, technologies and alternatives, recycling, efficiency, social and environmental implications, challenges
    Economics – math, costs and benefits, statistics, extrapolation, social implications
    Language and Arts - vocabulary, reading, poetry, creative writing, art
    Involvement of students and schools can be incentivized through District sponsored prizes or other benefits given for greatest measurable savings.

    Savings can be measured and charted through daily, weekly, monthly, etc., meter reading.

    This type of curriculum is easily incorporated with the inquiry-based methods, developed by Michael Klentschy, Superintendent of schools in the El Centro district of California, using the Scientific Notebook to incorporate Reading and Writing in Math and Science classes, and which have placed the El Centro schools at the top in test scores for California. Michael Klentschy was showcased at the "On The Road to 2012" conference in October, and he will make a presentation in Santa Fe soon. The Scientific Notebook method is being encouraged by the LANL foundation.

    Students love a challenge.
    Scenario - Principal announces to entire school community that everyone is to look for ways to save energy and water and reduce waste, 24 hours a day, with incentives...
    Scenario - Superintendent announces to schools that there will be a competition between schools for near and long-term efficiency improvements and cost savings, with prizes...
    This type of curriculum fosters the gradual development of a culture of efficiency with long-term benefits for students, school district, community, and environment. Students may encourage efficiency improvements at home, thus increasing the benefits to community and environment.

    ReplyDelete
  6. If SFPS put solar panels on all schools to save money and generate income by selling electricity back to PNM, we could put our roofs to work! Everytime I drive by Agua Fria Elelmentary I see a potential solar power plant with those slanted roofs everyone thinks are so ugly. Cesar Chavez is in the middle of a field of blazing sun - untapped energy.

    The electric bill for Alvord, the smallest school in SFPS, is about $18,000 per year. All other schools will be more than this. Multiply this by at least 32 (the number of schools in SFPS) and you have some serious money - $576,000 of RECURRING savings. And some of the bigger schools can probably generate more than they use, thereby creating an energy income for the district.

    Let's be creative, take advantage of stimulus programs that support alternative energy and the creation of solar trade jobs.

    Sincerely,
    Anna Heiniger
    mother, kindergartner, Alvord Magnet School

    ReplyDelete
  7. Offer school buildings as community buildings - charge low rent for their use during off-school hours.
    Offer hands-on learning experiences through student-volunteer projects that require fewer teaching hours & more interaction with the community. However, I am not a proponent of cutting teachers salaries in order to do this.
    We need to re-consider how our community is designed so that vehicle transportation could be cut significantly. Make it easier/safer for kids to bike/walk, and easier on parents, as well.

    -Lindsey Love
    Architecture for Humanity - Santa Fe

    ReplyDelete